Пт. Июл 4th, 2025

The Arrivabene Case Explodes! Another Injustice No One Is Talking About

A significant issue has emerged regarding the position of Maurizio Arrivabene, which could potentially be separated from other ongoing proceedings. This development, highlighting an alleged injustice, is reportedly not receiving the media attention it warrants.

Discussion around this topic on social media platforms reveals strong reactions and opinions from the public, particularly concerning the perceived treatment of Juventus by the justice and sporting systems.

Here are some comments reflecting public sentiment:

@tiberiocartelli2272: `But where does Nico fit in? On the bench/stands like Dusan, Arthur, and Douglas?`
@EMME-o1g: `Targeting Juve leads to convictions, sparks debate, brings publicity, and money to accusers, politicians included.`
@salvatorenicotina9338: `He should demand the maximum possible damages without any hesitation.`
@tizianopetrin3370: `Italy is a great country, but the justice system is third world.`
@giuseppediolosa7648: `What kind of country is Italy???? The justice system??????`
@sauromalachina3136: `But even in 2006, the ordinary justice system acquitted everyone, yet no one compensated us for the damages suffered. You`ll see, it will end up the same way now, unless certain individuals, whose names everyone knows, are jailed.`
@silvanochiolerio8453: `It`s easy since everyone [else] does capital gains but only Juve pays. The ten points should be returned to Juve from the start of the season, and the club acquitted for not having committed the act.`
@robertoalbanese6104: `Within the intricacies of our laws, there`s always a loophole interpretable to favor the `anti-Juve system`.`
@Joe-dh9mf: `Condemned for *minus*valenze!`
@vincenzotavoletti2861: `Yes, okay, whatever you want, the main problem is that nobody said or has said anything at all. The club hasn`t commented on anything.`
Marco Callusti: `We need to defend Juve.`
Ciro Randoni: `Usual media silence/omertà.`
Renzo Salandri: `Keep talking about it, you`re doing well, and spread these opinions.`

Regarding the Arrivabene case, some suggest it might be possible to accuse prosecutor Chiné of ideological falsehood. Concerning the capital gains case, the federal prosecutor`s office essentially stated that Juventus made `too many,` creating a `system.` However, a fundamental question arises: does the penal code consider an act that is not a crime in itself to become criminal merely through repetition? The logical answer is no. If Chiné were to admit this, it would fundamentally undermine the theory devised against Juventus, revealing it as potentially based on no actual criminal offense.

By Lennox Bray

Lennox Bray, from Leeds, England, is a Juventus-obsessed journalist with a knack for storytelling. He turns stats into gripping tales, whether it’s a last-minute win or a youth prospect’s rise.

Related Post