Strange referee appointments have sparked widespread fan outrage. Protests are erupting over perceived one-sided refereeing, incidents consistently favoring only one side, and unfair management of cards.
The recent match between Lazio and Juventus triggered a significant wave of protests from supporters. Fans expressed deep frustration and suspicion regarding the officiating.
Many questioned the purpose of competing in the Italian league under such perceived unfair conditions. There was significant criticism directed at the club`s perceived silence on these controversial issues, with some fans even suggesting canceling stadium and TV subscriptions as a form of protest.
Concerns were frequently raised about the consistency and application of VAR, with allegations that it intervenes against Juventus but not in their favor. The role of football commentators was also criticized for perceived bias.
Some commenters expressed a belief that the incidents are not coincidental, suggesting the reasons are known but kept hidden to protect a `rotten and colluding` system within football. A common sentiment was that Juventus is deliberately penalized to prevent them from winning titles.
Criticism extended to the quality of the VAR imagery itself, with some stating it doesn`t accurately reflect events on the pitch and calling the situations `scandalous`. One fan pointed out that the first foul called in Juventus`s favor occurred late in the match.
Frustration was palpable regarding the club`s apparent inaction, despite the unacceptable situations. Some fans drew comparisons to controversial incidents in other matches, suggesting a pattern of problematic refereeing.
Specific controversial moments were mentioned, such as a perceived foul on a Juventus player before an opponent`s goal, with television coverage across multiple networks also receiving criticism for its handling of these incidents.
Appointments of match officials were widely labeled as `shameful,` with direct accusations of bad faith made against the head of the refereeing body. The re-appointment of officials involved in previous controversial matches also fueled suspicion.
The club`s continued silence and perceived resignation on these matters were heavily criticized by supporters, leading to speculation about possible underlying reasons for the lack of public challenge.