Prominent Italian sports analyst Massimo Pavan has delivered a candid assessment of the ongoing transfer speculation surrounding player Alberto Costa, questioning the strategic rationale behind a potential sale.
In comments that cut directly to the heart of football club transfer strategy and player valuation, Pavan stated his strong reservations about the prospect of seeing Costa depart. He articulated that such a move would be bewildering unless the club were to receive an exceptionally high offer.
“Unfortunately, I wouldn`t understand the sale of Alberto Costa unless they offered you 30 million euros,” Pavan remarked.
His skepticism stems, in part, from Costa`s recent performances. Pavan highlighted that the Portuguese player demonstrated positive contributions and showed “good things” during the crucial final phase of the preceding season. The logic of offloading a player who finished the campaign strongly, without a compelling financial incentive, appears questionable in his view.
Adding another layer of critique, Pavan addressed the rumors suggesting Alberto Costa might be replaced by Dodò, reportedly from Fiorentina. His evaluation of this potential incoming transfer was notably dismissive.
“What`s the sense in selling the Portuguese…?” Pavan queried, before turning his attention to the rumored replacement. “But then he`s replaced with Dodò? Only `packages` come from Fiorentina, and it will be yet another package.”
The term “package” in this context is often used in football commentary, carrying a sense of a player who doesn`t meet expectations, is a poor fit, or perhaps represents questionable value for money. Pavan`s blunt assessment implies a lack of faith in Dodò`s potential contribution and, with a touch of cynical observation, suggests a pattern of disappointing transfers from the selling club`s side.
Ultimately, Pavan`s commentary serves as a pointed critique of a potential transfer decision, framing it as strategically unsound unless driven by an irresistible financial windfall (€30 million) and expressing strong doubt about the quality of the proposed replacement.