Unusual refereeing appointments and a perceived lack of fairness in officiating have sparked widespread protests among Juventus fans following the recent match against Lazio. Accusations of one-sided refereeing, incidents consistently going against the team, and inequitable card management are central to the fans` grievances.
The Lazio-Juventus match served as a catalyst for these protests. Fans have voiced their strong opinions, raising serious questions about the officiating standards. Many question why controversial incidents consistently seem to disadvantage Juventus every week, suggesting this is part of a deliberate effort, potentially orchestrated by a `system` controlling officials and influencing media and politics, aimed at preventing the club from reaching objectives like the Champions League.
Fans also highlighted the behavior of opposing players, noting that they often exaggerate fouls against Juventus knowing they are likely to receive favorable calls, a tactic rarely employed by Juve players themselves, though some argue they should adopt it given the circumstances.
Concerns were raised about the integrity of VAR reviews, including claims of crucial images or audio disappearing from broadcasts. Some fans called for independent monitoring of VAR proceedings, similar to how lottery draws are overseen, to ensure transparency and prevent the manipulation of evidence.
Specific refereeing decisions and appointments drew heavy criticism. The involvement of particular officials in controversial past matches and recent incidents, such as alleged fouls on Juve players leading to opponent goals or questionable red cards, were pointed out as evidence of biased officiating. The perceived bias extended to commentators, who fans feel are quick to dismiss VAR intervention for Juventus`s benefit but always support it when it goes against the team.
The club`s perceived silence on these matters also frustrated many supporters, who feel abandoned and ashamed by the lack of a strong stand against what they see as systemic injustice. Some suggested drastic measures like boycotting stadium attendance and pay TV subscriptions to impact the football federation financially.
Ultimately, a strong sense of unfairness and a belief that the league is manipulated for reasons beyond fair competition permeates the fan base`s reaction.