The media coverage surrounding Inter`s plea bargain reveals a stark difference in treatment compared to Juventus. There are crucial questions that no one in the media seems to be asking, and this is truly scandalous. The disparity in how Juventus and Inter are covered is evident. While the ruling on Inter`s plea bargain barely makes headlines, the day after, the focus often shifts back to attacking Juventus over past events.
We have highlighted on our social media channels and in our editorial segments the clear difference in treatment compared to Juventus and the three questions that no one dares to ask. This situation is alarming. What are your thoughts? Send us your comments and criticisms.
Many readers and supporters have expressed their frustration, pointing to a system that appears skilled at burying facts, similar to what happened during “Calciopoli.” They feel that TV and newspapers largely ignore the issue, suggesting protection from political and sporting institutions, implying that Inter will never face consequences. Some argue that simply being indignant isn`t enough; concrete action is needed, such as collectively canceling football subscriptions to truly impact the system.
There`s a call to name the journalists who omit these facts, viewing them as detrimental to football and distorting the narrative. Many Juventus fans feel they already know the answers to these unasked questions and are deeply disgusted by the situation. Despite the general indifference, some appreciate those who continue to give space to this matter, feeling that the mainstream media is complicit or afraid to speak up because “Inter must win.” There`s a strong sentiment that this perceived system benefiting Inter has been in place since 2006.
Comments consistently praise the effort to expose these “immense disgraces” and encourage sharing such content if one values the truth, implying that those who don`t share are colluding with the system.