An ongoing debate persists regarding alleged favorable refereeing decisions affecting football matches, particularly those involving Juventus. Discussions highlight perceived assistance received by certain clubs and controversial incidents, suggesting outcomes might be predetermined.
This controversy is linked to what some observers describe using critical terms and is exemplified by specific matches, including recent games involving River Plate, where favorable calls and expulsions are alleged to have occurred. The situation involving Manchester City is also anticipated within this contentious framework, reinforcing the view that such outcomes are “all planned.”
Furthermore, a critical perspective, referred to as the “Train of Shame,” suggests a system that potentially disadvantages Juventus, pushing the club into a difficult situation (“dead end”), even while others benefit from perceived protection or favorable treatment.